Posts Tagged ‘gift tax’

New Tax Law Will Mean More Planning Is Necessary, Not Less

JUNE 18, 2001 VOLUME 8, NUMBER 51

Last week Elder Law Issues predicted that the principal effect of the federal government’s estate tax repeal would be to make most people revisit their estate plans (and their attorney) more often. Because of the automatic “sunset” of the repeal measure in 2011, any plan addressing the changes in estate taxes must also deal with the real possibility that the tax will be reinstated in ten years. Even if the repeal becomes fully effective the imposition of a system of “carry-over basis” will mean that wealthy individuals still need to plan for taxes imposed on their heirs.

Not surprisingly, the new tax law is considerably more complicated than even those changes. A number of other provisions affect individual estate plans, and not all of those have been widely discussed or explained. Among the other changes in the new tax law:

The generation-skipping tax (usually referred to as the GST) will be reduced and, ultimately, eliminated. Current law imposes an additional tax on some property left to grandchildren and other younger beneficiaries. There is an exemption as to the first $1,060,000 left to later generations: that exemption will begin to increase with the estate tax exemption itself in 2004. Until that time the current maximum (adjusted annually for inflation) applies.
Current estate tax law allows some owner of family businesses to pass a larger amount to their heirs without incurring estate taxes. Although it can be difficult to qualify for the favorable treatment, at least some small business owners can take advantage of the so-called QFOBI (“Qualified Family Owned Business Interests”) rules to pass a total of up to $1.35 million without estate taxes. That special deduction for family business owners will end after 2003.
Limits on contributions to retirement accounts will increase in steps beginning in 2002. Not everyone can pay in to IRA and 401(k) plans. Those who can will find that maximum IRA contributions increase to $3,000 in 2002, to $4,000 in 2005 and to $5,000 in 2008. 401(k) limits (now set at $10,500) increase to $11,000 in 2002 and by an additional $1,000 each year until 2006 (when the limit will have reached $15,000). Contribution limits are raised for other, less-common retirement plans as well.
Gift taxes are not scheduled for repeal. Although the current transfer tax system treats lifetime gifts and transfers at death in a unified approach, that relationship diminishes next year and ends in 2010. After 2002, gifts of more than $1 million will be subject to the gift tax even though there might not be any estate tax if the property had been held until the owner’s death.

What do all the estate, gift and income tax changes mean? Most people will need to reconsider their current estate plan now, and at least once again as the 2011 deadline draws near.

Share

What Estate Tax Repeal Means For Most Taxpayers: Not Much

JUNE 11, 2001 VOLUME 8, NUMBER 50

On June 7, 2001, President George W. Bush signed the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. Despite extensive media coverage of tax reform, and especially of estate tax repeal, over the past six months, you may have been left wondering what it means. It turns out that it doesn’t mean much for most of us.

Estate tax repeal will have one of two effects for most people. For some, the change in tax laws will mean they must spend more on lawyer’s fees for changes to their estate plans—and may have to make more than one set of changes as the rules slowly shift over the next decade. For most people, however, the principal effect of estate tax repeal will be felt when government revenue must be raised from some other source—possibly including taxes on middle class citizens who wouldn’t have paid estate taxes under the old rules.

There are four elements of estate tax repeal that make it difficult to predict exactly what will happen over upcoming months and years:

Reductions in the estate tax will be phased in over a ten-year period, with relatively little change before full repeal. The current $675,000 exemption from federal estate tax liability is raised to $1 million next year and then increases slowly, but it only reaches $3.5 million before repeal.
The top tax rate drops slightly each year, from the current 55% to 45% in the year before the tax is finally eliminated.
Upon repeal of the estate tax, a new system of taxation is imposed—heirs will pay income taxes on capital gains when they sell inherited property. There will, however, be a substantial exclusion from this new tax—$1,300,000 of gain for every decedent’s estate, and another $3,000,000 of gain for surviving spouses.
Estate tax repeal is itself repealed in 2011.

That’s right: as currently written, the law ending the estate tax in 2010 ends (and the estate tax returns) in 2011. Authors of the tax repeal measure insist that they only included that provision in order to “balance” the budget for the next decade, but real estate tax repeal will require another Congress and President to sign another bill sometime in the next decade.

The new law eventually eliminates the “generation-skipping” tax, which penalized transfers to grandchildren (although a $1 million exemption makes the penalty less onerous). The gift tax, however, remains in effect—to keep taxpayers from giving their property to terminally ill family members expecting to get the property back within a few years.

Meanwhile, no one dares predict how federal estate tax “repeal” will affect state governments, where the estate tax has been a major source of revenue for decades. Arizona, for example, received about $80 million from the state estate tax last year. The federal credit for payment of state taxes will be phased out starting in 2002, so that the effect of estate tax reductions will be smaller—unless states follow the federal governments’ lead.

Share
©2012 Fleming & Curti, PLC